Radiometric dating is false radiometric dating is false

Posted by / 19-Jul-2017 03:08

Radiometric dating is false

First, it provides no evidence whatsoever to support their claim that the earth is very young.If the earth were only 6000–10 000 years old, then surely there should be some scientific evidence to confirm that hypothesis; yet the creationists have produced not a shred of it so far.

This is a tall order and the creationists have made no progress so far.

The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly a few typical radiometric dating studies, out of hundreds of possible examples documented in the scientific literature, in which the ages are validated by other available information.

I have selected four examples from recent literature, mostly studies involving my work and that of a few close colleagues because it was easy to do so.

It will probably fail, but what would a reasonable person conclude from that? All they indicate is that the methods are not infallible.

Those of us who have developed and used dating techniques to solve scientific problems are well aware that the systems are not perfect; we ourselves have provided numerous examples of instances in which the techniques fail.

radiometric dating is false-19radiometric dating is false-13radiometric dating is false-54

One thought on “radiometric dating is false”

  1. I put in my locker combination and grabbed some books that I need for my morning classes."Hey! Today is the big Pep Rally to support our baseball team, softball team, track team, and the dance team. Today is the day when we'll get to post our second official dance video.